Screener
BBLU vs EEMS
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both BBLU and EEMS are equity ETFs. BBLU charges 0.15% a year and EEMS 0.72%. The main difference: BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EEMS uses index tracking.
- BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EEMS uses index tracking.
- BBLU covers North America; EEMS covers emerging markets.
- BBLU costs 0.57% less per year.
- Over the last three years, BBLU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBLU | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $398M |
| Since | 1997 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.42% | 18.09% |
| Max drawdown | -17.20% | -48.89% |
Similar to BBLU and EEMS
Explore further