Screener
EEMS vs SCZ
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than EEMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMS covers emerging markets markets; SCZ covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMS | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $452M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.4% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 14.44% |
| Max drawdown | -48.89% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMS and SCZ
Explore further