Screener
BBLU vs EFA
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
Both BBLU and EFA are equity ETFs. BBLU charges 0.15% a year and EFA 0.32%. The main difference: BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EFA uses index tracking.
- BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EFA uses index tracking.
- BBLU covers North America; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
- BBLU costs 0.17% less per year.
- EFA is much larger than BBLU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BBLU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBLU | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $77.4B |
| Since | 1997 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 3.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.42% | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -17.20% | -34.19% |
Similar to BBLU and EFA
Explore further