Screener
BBLU vs EMSF
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
Key differences
Both BBLU and EMSF are equity ETFs. BBLU charges 0.15% a year and EMSF 0.79%. The main difference: BBLU covers North America; EMSF covers emerging markets.
- BBLU covers North America; EMSF covers emerging markets.
- BBLU costs 0.64% less per year.
- BBLU is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBLU | EMSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $46M |
| Since | 1997 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.42% | 25.56% |
| Max drawdown | -17.20% | -24.75% |
Similar to BBLU and EMSF
Explore further