Screener
BBLU vs FBCG
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- BBLU costs 0.42% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than BBLU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBLU covers north america markets; FBCG covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBLU | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $6.9B |
| Since | 1997 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.42% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -17.20% | -43.56% |
Similar to BBLU and FBCG
Explore further