Screener
FBCG vs TCHP
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- FBCG covers global markets; TCHP covers north america.
- FBCG follows a active selection strategy; TCHP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCG | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.5% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -43.56% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCG and TCHP
Explore further