Screener
BCCC vs BITO
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs ProShares Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- BCCC costs 0.20% less per year.
- BITO is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCCC is classified as alternative, while BITO is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCCC | BITO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 71.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | — |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -33.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +31.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 43.21% |
| Max drawdown | -42.15% | -77.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCCC and BITO
Explore further