Screener
BITO vs BTCC
ProShares Bitcoin ETF vs Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- BTCC costs 0.30% less per year.
- BITO is significantly larger than BTCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITO is classified as cryptocurrency, while BTCC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITO | BTCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $17M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 71.92% | 83.34% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -33.2% | -22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.21% | 32.12% |
| Max drawdown | -77.86% | -44.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITO and BTCC
Explore further