Screener
BCEM vs FELG
Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both BCEM and FELG are equity ETFs. BCEM charges 0.80% a year and FELG 0.18%. The main difference: BCEM follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
- BCEM follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
- BCEM covers emerging markets; FELG covers North America.
- FELG costs 0.62% less per year.
- FELG is much larger than BCEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCEM | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.96% |
| Max drawdown | -8.79% | -23.89% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.