Screener
BCFN vs CCOR
Baron Financials ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- BCFN costs 0.49% less per year.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BCFN follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $28M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and CCOR
Explore further