Screener
BCFN vs GEM
Baron Financials ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BCFN and GEM are equity ETFs. BCFN charges 0.80% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: BCFN follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- BCFN follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- BCFN covers North America; GEM covers emerging markets.
- GEM costs 0.45% less per year.
- GEM is much larger than BCFN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2019 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +44.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.09% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -37.02% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.