Screener
GEM vs GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSIE costs 0.10% less per year.
- GSIE is significantly larger than GEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEM covers emerging markets markets; GSIE covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEM | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $5.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 14.21% |
| Max drawdown | -37.02% | -34.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEM and GSIE
Explore further