Screener
BCFN vs IWD
Baron Financials ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.62% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $74.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -38.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and IWD
Explore further