Screener
IWD vs IWN
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.06% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than IWN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWD | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74.3B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -38.51% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWD and IWN
Explore further