Screener
BCFN vs KRE
Baron Financials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
Key differences
- KRE costs 0.45% less per year.
- KRE is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KRE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | KRE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $4.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.30% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -55.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and KRE
Explore further