Screener
BCFN vs KBE
Baron Financials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF
Key differences
- KBE costs 0.45% less per year.
- KBE is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KBE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | KBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.59% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -53.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and KBE
Explore further