Screener
BCFN vs REMG
Baron Financials ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BCFN and REMG are equity ETFs. BCFN charges 0.80% a year and REMG 0.64%. The main difference: BCFN covers global markets; REMG covers emerging markets.
- BCFN covers global markets; REMG covers emerging markets.
- REMG costs 0.16% less per year.
- BCFN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $103M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +48.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.13% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -14.13% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.