Screener
BCFN vs EMOP
Baron Financials ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
Key differences
Both BCFN and EMOP are equity ETFs. BCFN charges 0.80% a year and EMOP 0.70%. The main difference: BCFN covers global markets; EMOP covers emerging markets.
- BCFN covers global markets; EMOP covers emerging markets.
- EMOP costs 0.10% less per year.
- EMOP is much larger than BCFN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | EMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 1995 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -12.87% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.