Screener
BCFN vs XLF
Baron Financials ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLF costs 0.72% less per year.
- XLF is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $51.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.47% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -42.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and XLF
Explore further