Screener
BCGD vs FFND
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- BCGD costs 0.25% less per year.
- FFND is significantly larger than BCGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCGD follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCGD | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $99M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -13.78% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCGD and FFND
Explore further