Screener
BCHP vs CCOR
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- BCHP costs 0.71% less per year.
- BCHP is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BCHP covers global markets; CCOR covers north america.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $28M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and CCOR
Explore further