Screener
BCHP vs FDRS
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.09% less per year.
- BCHP is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BCHP covers global markets; FDRS covers north america.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $77M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and FDRS
Explore further