Screener
BCHP vs EMPB
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
Key differences
- BCHP costs 1.63% less per year.
- BCHP is significantly larger than EMPB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP is classified as equity, while EMPB is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BCHP covers global markets; EMPB covers north america.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; EMPB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | EMPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 2.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $18M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 11.41% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -7.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and EMPB
Explore further