Screener
BCHP vs SPAM
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.23% less per year.
- BCHP is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP covers global markets; SPAM covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.5% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.82% | 25.42% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -24.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and SPAM
Explore further