Screener
BCSM vs FNDC
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDC costs 0.36% less per year.
- FNDC is significantly larger than BCSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCSM | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.24% |
| Max drawdown | -17.45% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCSM and FNDC
Explore further