Screener
BCSM vs FNDF
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.50% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than BCSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCSM covers north america markets; FNDF covers global ex us.
- FNDF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCSM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -17.45% | -40.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCSM and FNDF
Explore further