Screener
BCTK vs IXN
Baron Technology ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.36% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than BCTK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCTK | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $165M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +35.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.62% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCTK and IXN
Explore further