Screener
BDGS vs AOA
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 0.72% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than BDGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and AOA
Explore further