Screener
BDGS vs AOK
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOK costs 0.72% less per year.
- AOK is significantly larger than BDGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while AOK is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | AOK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $756M |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 5.78% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -18.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and AOK
Explore further