Screener
BDGS vs MAGO
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
BDGS is an equity ETF, while MAGO is an alternative ETF. BDGS charges 0.87% a year and MAGO 0.99%.
- BDGS is an equity fund, while MAGO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; MAGO uses option income.
- BDGS costs 0.12% less per year.
- BDGS is much larger than MAGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.13% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -17.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.