Screener
MAGO vs FDAT
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
MAGO is an alternative ETF, while FDAT is a fixed income ETF. MAGO charges 0.99% a year and FDAT 0.78%.
- MAGO is an alternative fund, while FDAT is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; FDAT uses tactical allocation.
- FDAT costs 0.21% less per year.
- FDAT is much larger than MAGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | FDAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $36M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.36% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -8.20% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.