Screener
BDGS vs QTAC
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- BDGS costs 0.91% less per year.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while QTAC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $54M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and QTAC
Explore further