Screener
QTAC vs TUG
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 1.13% less per year.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while TUG is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; TUG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $42M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and TUG
Explore further