Screener
BDGS vs RHRX
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- BDGS costs 0.51% less per year.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and RHRX
Explore further