Screener
RHRX vs TUG
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.73% less per year.
- RHRX is classified as alternative, while TUG is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; TUG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $42M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHRX and TUG
Explore further