Screener
BDYN vs INTL
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.44% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDYN is classified as mixed asset, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BDYN follows a active selection strategy; INTL uses option income.
- BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDYN | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $222M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.26% |
| Max drawdown | -10.85% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDYN and INTL
Explore further