Screener
INTL vs ENHI
Main International ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.57% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $11M |
| Since | 2022 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and ENHI
Explore further