Screener
BEDZ vs AADR
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
Key differences
- BEDZ costs 0.10% less per year.
- AADR is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BEDZ covers north america markets; AADR covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, AADR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AADR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BEDZ | AADR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $45M |
| Since | 2021 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 0.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.46% | 21.48% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -45.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BEDZ and AADR
Explore further