Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BEDZ vs DWSH

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

AdvisorShares

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$2M

DWSH

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

AdvisorShares

Annual cost

6.22%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • BEDZ costs 5.23% less per year.
  • DWSH is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BEDZ is classified as equity, while DWSH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • BEDZ follows a active selection strategy; DWSH uses long short.
  • Over the last 3 years, BEDZ has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

BEDZDWSH
Annual cost (TER)0.99%6.22%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$9M
Since20212018
Dividend yield2.28%6.38%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1Y+22.0%-13.1%
CAGR 3Y+14.2%-5.3%
CAGR 5Y+8.4%-2.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.56-0.28
Volatility 1Y20.46%21.02%
Max drawdown-29.70%-82.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BEDZ and DWSH