Screener
BEDZ vs RTH
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs VanEck Retail ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.64% less per year.
- RTH is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BEDZ follows a active selection strategy; RTH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BEDZ | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $265M |
| Since | 2021 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.46% | 11.88% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -25.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BEDZ and RTH
Explore further