Screener
BELT vs EFA
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.43% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BELT covers north america markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- BELT follows a index enhanced strategy; EFA uses index tracking.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BELT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.21% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -23.05% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BELT and EFA
Explore further