Screener
BELT vs IWL
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.60% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BELT follows a index enhanced strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BELT | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.21% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -23.05% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BELT and IWL
Explore further