Screener
IWL vs IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | IWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $3.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 10.11% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and IWX
Explore further