Screener
BFIX vs EPRF
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF
Key differences
- EPRF is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; EPRF uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | EPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $72M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 6.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.91% | 7.59% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -26.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and EPRF
Explore further