Screener
EPRF vs PGX
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGX is significantly larger than EPRF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF is classified as alternative, while PGX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PGX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | -0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 6.14% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPRF and PGX
Explore further