Screener
BFIX vs IG
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.26% less per year.
- IG is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; IG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $179M |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and IG
Explore further