Screener
BFIX vs VRP
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRP is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while VRP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VRP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.91% | 2.89% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -46.04% |
Similar to BFIX and VRP
Explore further