Screener
BFIX vs VRIG
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.15% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VRIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.91% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -13.04% |
Similar to BFIX and VRIG
Explore further