Screener
BFLX vs DFAW
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs Dimensional World Equity ETF
Key differences
- DFAW costs 0.16% less per year.
- BFLX follows a active selection strategy; DFAW uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | DFAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -16.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and DFAW
Explore further