Screener
BFLX vs INTF
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs iShares International Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.24% less per year.
- BFLX follows a active selection strategy; INTF uses index tracking.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $3.4B |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.62% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -40.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and INTF
Explore further